Janet's Conner

This Blog tell the Truth and will never not tell the Truth. Impeach Bush

Sunday, September 10, 2006


Fort Eustis, Virginia---Long before the United States invaded Iraq in 2003, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld forbade military strategists to develop plans for securing a postwar Iraq, the retiring commander of the Army Transportation Corps said Thursday.

Daily Press (Newport News, Va.)
By: Stephanie Heinatz
September 9, 2006

In fact, said Brig. Gen. Mark Schneid, Rumsfeld said "he would fire the next person" who talked about the need for a postwar plan.

Rumsfeld did replace Gen. Eric Shineski, the Army chief in 2003, after Shineski told Congress that hundreds of thousands of troops would be needed to secure postwar Iraq.

Schneid, who is also the commander of Fort Eustis in Newport News, made his comments in an interview with The Daily Press. He retires in about 3 weeks.

Schneid's comments are further confirmation of the version of events reported in "Cobra II: The Inside Story of the Invasion and Occupation of Iraq," the book by New York Times reporter Michael R. Gordon and retired Marine Corps Lt. Gen. Bernard E. Trainor.

In 2001, Schneid was a colonel with the Central Command, the unit that oversees U.S. military operations in the Mideast.

On Sept. 10, 2001, he was selected to be the chief of logistic war plans.

On Sept. 11, he said, "life just went to hell."

That day, Gen. Tommy Franks, the commander of Central Command, told his planners, including Schneid, to "get ready to go to war."

A day or two later, Rumsfeld was "telling us we were going to war in Afghanastan and to start building the war plan. We were going to go fast.

"Then, just as we were barely into Afghanastan, Rumsfeld came and told us to get ready for Iraq."

Schneid said he remembers everyone thinking, "Mr gosh, we're in the middle of Afghanastan, how can we possibly be doing two at one time? How can we pull this off? It's just going to be too much."

Planning was kept very hush-hush in those early days.

"There was only a handful of people, maybe 5 or 6, that were involved with that plan because it had to be kept very, very quiet."

There was already an offensive plan in place for Iraq, Schneid said. And in the beginning, the planners were just expanding on it.

"Whether we were going to execute it, we had no idea," Schneid said.

Eventually other military agencies like the transportation and Army material commands had to get involved.

They couldn't just "keep planning this in the dark," Schneid said.

Planning continued to be a challenge.

"The secretary of defense continued to push us that everything we write in our plan has to be the idea that we are going to go in, we're going to take out the regime, and then we're going to leave," Schneid said. "We won't stay."

Schneid said the planners continued to try "to write what was called Phase 4," or the piece of the plan that included post-invasion operations like security, stability and reconstruction.

Even if the troops didn't stay, "at least we have to plan for it," Schneid said.

"I remember the secretary of defense saying that he would fire the next person that said that," Schneid said. "We would not do planning for Phase 4 operations, which would require all those additional troops that people talk about today.

"He said we will not do that because the American people would not back us if they think we are going over there for a long war."

Even if the people who laid out the initial war plans had fleshed out post-invasion missions, the fighting and insurgent attacks going on today would have been hard to predict, Schneid said.

"We really thought that after the collapse of the regime we were going to do all these humanitarian type things," he said. "We thought this would go pretty fast and we'd be able to get out of there. We really didn't anticipate them to continue to fight the way they did or come back the way they are.

"Now we're going more toward a Civil War. We didn't see that coming."

While Schneid, a soldier since 1977, spoke candidly about the days leading up to the invasion of Iraq, he remains concerned about the U.S. public's views of the troops. He's bothered by the nationwide divide over the war and fearful that patriotism among citizens will continue to decline.

"We're really hurting right now," he said.

***There is a lot of support for our troops. They had nothing to do with the planning of the war. What Schneid needs to know is that the American people "Support The Troops," but they don't "Support the President!" The Bush Administration is trying to confuse the people, just like they are doing with Iraq and the war on terror. They are not one in the same. They are 2 totally different entities, as is our support for our troops and the support for the preseident. You can support one without supporting the other. The Bush administration doesn't want to do that though. They don't want the American people to see the difference between the two because then that will show how many people "really DON'T" support the president!

"God Bless the American People and Our Troops!"


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home