Janet's Conner

This Blog tell the Truth and will never not tell the Truth. Impeach Bush

Friday, July 21, 2006

WHERE ARE BUSH'S CRITICS NOW?




When Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert unleashed his navy and air force on Lebanon, accusing that tiny nation of an Act of War," the last pillar of Bush's Middle East policy collapsed.

First came capitulation on the Bush Doctrine, as Pyongyang and Tehran defied Bush's dictum: The world's worst regimes will not be allowed to acquire the world's worst weapons. Then came suspicion of the democracy crusade as Islamic militants exploited free elections to advance power and office in Egypt, Lebanon, Gaza, the West Bank, Iraq and Iran.

Now Israel's rampage against a defenseless Lebanon---smashing airport runways, fuel tanks, power plants, gas stations, lighthouses, bridges, roads, and the occasional refugee convoy---has exposed Bush's folly in subcontracting U.S. policy out to Tel Aviv, thus making Israel the custodian of our reputation and interests in the Middle East.

The Lebanon that Israel, with Bush's blessing, is smashing up has a pro-American government, heretofore considered a shining example of his democracy crusade. Yet, asked in St. Petersburg if he would urge Israel to use restraint in its air attacks, Bush sounded less like the leader of the Free World than some bellicose city councilman from Brooklyn Heights.

What Israel is up to is described by its Army Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Dan Halutz when he threatened to "turn back the clock in Lebanon 20 years."

Israel seized upon Hezbollah's capture of two Israeli soldiers to unleash the IDF in a pre-planned attack to make Lebanese people suffer until the Lebanese government disarms Hezbollah, a task the Israeli army could not accomplish in 18 years of occupation.

Israel is doing the same to the Palestinians. To punish these people for the crime of electing Hamas, Olmert imposed an economic blockade of Gaza and the West Bank and withheld the $50M in monthly tax and customs receipts due the Palestinians.

Then, Israel instructed the United States to terminate all aid to the Palestinian Authority, though Bush himself had called for the elections and for the participation of Hamas. Our Crawford cowboy mekely complied.

The predictable result: Fatah and Hamas fell to fratricidal fighting, and Hamas militants began launching Qassam rockets over the fence from Gaza into Israel. Hamas then tunneled into Israel, killed two soldiers, captured one, took him back into Gaza, and demanded a prisoner exchange.

Israel's response was to abduct half of the Palestinian cabinet and parliament and blow up a $50M U.S.-insured power plant. That cut off electricity for half a million Palestinians. Their food spoiled, their water could not be purified, and their families sweltered in the summer heat of the Gaza desert. One family of seven was wiped out on a beach by what the IDF assures us was an errant artillery shell.

Let it be said: Israel has a right to defend herself, a right to counterattack against Hezbollah and Hamas, a right to clean out bases from which Katyusha or Qassam rockets are being fired, and a right to occupy land from which attacks are mounted on her people.

But what Israel is doing is imposing deliberate suffering on civilians, collective punishment on innocent people, to force them to do something they are powerless to do; disarm the gunmen among them. Such a policy violates international law and comports neither with our values nor our interests. IT IS UN-AMERICAN AND UN-CHRISTIAN.

BUT WHERE ARE THE CHRISTIANS? Why is Pope Benedict virtually alone among Christian leaders to have spoken out against what is being done to Lebanese Christians and Muslims?

When al-Qaeda captured two U.S. soldiers and barbarically butchered them, the U.S. Army did not smash power plants across the Sunni Triangle. WHY THEN IS BUSH OPENLY SUPPORTIVE WHEN ISRAELIS DO THIS?

Democrats attack Bush for crimes of which he is not guilty, including Haditha and Abu Ghraib. (*That's only one opinion!) Why are they, too, silent when Israel pursues a conscious policy of collective punishment of innocent peoples?

Britain's diplomatic goal in two world wars was to bring the naive cousins in, to "pull their chestnuts out of the fire." Israel and her paid and pro-bono agents here appear to be determined to expand the Iraq war into Syria and Iran, and have America fight and finish all of Israel's enemies.

That Tel Aviv is maneuvering us to fight its wars is understandable. That Americans are ignorant of, or complicit in this, is deplorable.

Already Bush is ranting about Syria being behind the Hezbollah capture of the Israeli soldiers. BUT WHERE IS THE PROOF?

WHO IS WHISPERING IN HIS EAR? THE SAME PEOPLE WHO TOLD HIM IRAQ WAS MAYBE MONTHS AWAY FROM AN ATOM BOMB, THAT AN INVASION WOULD BE A "CAKEWALK," THAT HE WOULD BE CHURCHILL, THAT U.S. TROOPS WOULD BE GREETED WITH CANDY AND FLOWERS, THAT DEMOCRACY WOULD BREAK OUT ACROSS THE REGION, THAT PALESTINIANS AND ISRAELIS WOULD THEN SIT DOWN AND MAKE PEACE?

HOW MUCH MUST AMERICA PAY FOR THE EDUCATION OF THIS MAN?


***Israel is in Lebanon for America! Bush couldn't go because the elections are coming up. If he did go into Syria and Iran like he's planned ever since Iraq, the people would never forgive him and the Republicans. So, Bush found a back door into Syria. Lebanon! Just like Bush found a back door for Dubai Ports World with the hidden language in the Oman Trade Deal that was voted on yesterday. Specifically, the language allows a "right of establishment" to any company based in Oman. That presented an avenue for Dubai Ports World, or any other company with dubious ties, to set up a small operation in Oman and then lay claim to a U.S. port. In other words, the Bush administration lied to the people "once again" when he said that the DPW deal wouldn't go through when the people complained about possible terrorist attacks that may come with the agreement. This vote was not so much about trade as about security. Our homeland security and our national security regarding threats of terrorism against our nation and our people, was pulverized when the Republicans and 14 Democrats voted in favor of this trade agreement. Evidently, they are not serious about keeping this country safe and not one of them should be re-elected!


Commentary By: Patrick J. Buchanan
July 19, 2006


0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home