Janet's Conner

This Blog tell the Truth and will never not tell the Truth. Impeach Bush

Sunday, July 09, 2006

INVESTIGATORS TRANSPORTED RADIOACTIVE SOURCES ACROSS OUR NATION'S BORDERS AT TWO LOCATIONS




***So you think that the Bush administration and his Republican puppets in Congress are keeping you safe? Well read this and you can decide for yourself. Maybe next time the Republicans tell you that they are better on national security, you'll think twice about it!


WHY GAO DID THIS STUDY

Given today's unprecedented terrorism threat environmental and the resulting widespread congressional and public interests in the security of our nation's borders, GAO conducted an investigation testing whether radioactive sources could be smuggled across the U.S.

Most travelers enter the United States through the nation's 154 land borders ports of entry. Department of Homeland Security U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) inspectors at ports of entry are responsible for the primary inspection of travelers to determine their admissibility into the United States and to enforce the laws related to preventing the entry of contraband, such as drugs and weapons of mass destruction.

GAO's testimony provides the results of undercover tests made by it investigators to determine whether monitors at U.S. ports of entry detect radioactive sources in vehicles attempting to enter the United States. GAO also provides observations regarding the procedures that CBP inspectors followed during its investigation.


WHAT GAO FOUND

For the purposes of this undercover investigation, GAO purchased a small amount of radioactive sources and one secure container used to safely store and transport the material from a commercial source over the telephone. One of GAO's investigators, posing as an employee of a fictitious company located in Washinton, D.C., stated that the purpose of his purchase was to use the radioactive sources to calibrate personal radiation detection pagers. The purchase was not challenged because suppliers are not required to determine whether prospective buyers have legitimate uses for radioactive sources, nor are suppliers required to ask a buyer to produce an NRC document when purchasing in small qauntities. The amount of radioactive sources GAO's investigator sought to purchase did not require an NRC document. Subsequently, the company mailed the radioactive sources to an address in Washington, D.C.

The radiation portal monitors properly signaled the presence of radioactive material when our two teams of investigators conducted simultaneous border crossings. Our investigators' vehicles were inspected in accordance with most of the CBP policy at both the northern and southern borders. However, GAO's investigators, using counterfeit documents, were able to enter the United States with enough radioactive sources in the trunks of their vehicles to make two dirty bombs. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a dirty bomb is a mix of explosives, such as dynamite, with radioactive powder or pellets. When the dynamite or other explosives are set off, the blast carries radioactive material into the surrounding area. The direct costs of cleanup and the indirect losses in trade and business in the contaminated areas could be large. Hence, dirty bombs are generally considered to be weapons of mass disruption instead of weapons of mass destruction GAO investigators were able to successfully represent themselves as employees of a fictitious company present a counterfeit bill of lading and a counterfeit NRC document during the secondary inspections at both locations. The CBP inspectors never questioned the authenticity of the investigators' counterfeit bill of lading or the counterfeit NRC document authorizing them to receive, acquire, possess, and transfer radioactive sources.

GAO has also issued a report on the results of this investigation (GAO-06-545R)


***This rubber-stamp Congress sure isn't protecting us. The Republicans keep telling us how they are protecting the homeland. This proves that they are not capable of what they say they are doing and what is actually getting done! IT'S TIME FOR CHANGE IN CONGRESS.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home