Janet's Conner

This Blog tell the Truth and will never not tell the Truth. Impeach Bush

Monday, July 17, 2006

CORRUPTION CITED IN IRAQ'S OIL INDUSTRY




U.S. Comptroller General David M. Walker told Congress last week that "massive corruption" and "a lot of theft going on" in Iraq's government-controlled oil industry is hampering the country's ability to govern itself.

"It took me about, you know, a second and a half to realize that, obviously, there was corruption going on, because the numbers just didn't add up," Walker said, referring to a trip he took to Iraq this year in which he was shown figures on oil production and revenue.

***Is this Bush's way of telling us he is going to have elections again?

Walker, who heads the Government Accountability Office, made his remarks at a House Government Reform subcommittee meeting last Tuesday called to examine implementation of the Bush administration's 2005 "National Strategy for Victory in Iraq." He said one of the failures of the U.S. program was related to the prewar assumption that Iraq would be able to pay for its reconstruction "in large part through oil revenues."

He said about 10% of Iraq's refined fuels and 30% of its imported fuels are being stolen, in part because the subsidized Iraqi price of gasoline, about 44 cents a gallon, is less than half the regional price of 90 cents a gallon. "That provides a tremendous incentive to be able to steal these fuels and be about to sell them for whatevr purposes, corruption or otherwise," Walker said.

Walker noted that oil production, which was to provide prime support to the new government, is below prewar production and distribution levels, complicated by the insurgency and difficulties in maintaining the aging oil infrastructure.

Another GAO official, Joseph Christoff, director of international affairs and trade, pointed out that the Iraqi budget is paying for "what some could contend to be a bloated bureaucracy, primarily because oftentimes you don't know who is working in the different industries---there are ghost employees."

Rep. Christopher Shays, chairman of the subcommittee on national security, said the hearing was held to determine "whether we had and have a strategy and to what extent that strategy is meeting the needs of our engagement in Iraq."

***The Bush administration doesn't have a strategy! His strategy is to "stay the course" and continue to save face.

The GAO report criticized the administration's strategy for not identifying which U.S. agencies are responsible for implementation, for not integrating U.S. goals and objectives with the Iraqi government and for failing to identify future costs.

James Jeffrey of the State Department's Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs also testified at the hearing. "The organization roles have been as clear as I have ever seen," he said, but he acknowledged, "Of course there are disputes." He said the GAO was correct in saying that "we haven't been able to align our goals, our resources and such fully with the Iraqis," but added: "That's because we have not had a long-term Iraqi government."

***Well maybe we would have a long-term Iraqi government if Bush wouldn't keep changing it because they don't want to do things "his" way!

He said the reconstruction program, which involved the Defense Department, the State Department and the Agency for International Development, was, at $21.9B, "the largest...since the Marshall Plan." He said that prewar assumptions that "there would be a permissive security environment that would allow reconstruction to go forward" turned out to be wrong along with the estimate "that the Iraqi government would make important contributions to the reconstruction effort."

***Why is it that all other reconstruction has been interrupted, but the reconstruction for the huge American Embassy if Iraq hasn't? Where is all of these monies for the Embassy coming from? Better yet, what kind of plans does the Bush administration have for Iraq? Are we colonizing?

As a result, Jeffrey said, "we shifted billions of dollars from longer-term infrastructure into shorter-term projects---primarily security, but also democracy programs."

But "without security," he said, "you really can't do anything or enough on the political and economic tracks. However...the solution to the security situation is not military but political."

Walker's GAO report critisized the administration's failure to identify "current and future costs" or "the sources of funding needed to achieve U.S. political security and economic objectives in Iraq."

The report concludes that neither the Defense Department nor Congress "can relaibly determine the costs of the war, nor do they have details on how appropriated funds are being spent or historical data useful in considering future funding needs." He said it costs about $1.5B a week for U.S. military operations, reconstruction and support for Iraqi forces.

***If the Defense Department isn't itemizing costs, then there is only one reason for that. THEFT BY THIS ADMINISTRATION! This information is vitally important for historical reasons and this administration knows that!

Walker said that although the administration "has resisted for several years providing cost estimates longer than one year in advance, there is a basis to come up with some estimates."

***When the Bush administration goes to Congress for more funding for Iraq, they say that it's for the troops and their equipment. They do this so that if anyone votes "NO," they can have it on record that either this senator or that representative voted "NO," when it came to supporting our troops. The Bush administration is doing this for their political gain when it comes time for elections. This is one of the reasons that they don't itemize!

The Congressional Budget Office last week released its estimate of potential spending requirements for Iraq in the fiscal years 2007 to 2016 based on scenarios where there was either a rapid or slow drawdown of U.S. forces. In the case of rapid withdrawal---troops out by 2009---the CBO estimated an additional $166B would be needed for military operations, on top of $290B already allocated. For a slower withdrawal, were 40,000 troops stay through 2016, it would cost $368B, said the CBO.

***2016! How about that! In the meantime, our schools are going down along with employment and every other thing that the middle class used to look forward too, like being able to retire! The American dream is shot, all because of this Republican Bush Administration. Remember that when you go to the polls in November.

Source of Info: Washington Post
Walter Pincus
July 17, 2006

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home